Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2018, Page: 52-58
Nuclear Forensics and Development of Non-Destructive Scrutiny Facility (NDSF) for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Salah Ud-Din Khan, Sustainable Energy Technologies Center, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Received: Mar. 12, 2019;       Accepted: Apr. 22, 2019;       Published: May 31, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ns.20180304.11      View  482      Downloads  59
In this paper, theoretical model for nuclear forensics is developed and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is considered as the case study. The main objective of this research is the development of procedure for nuclear forensics and infrastructure for non-destructive scrutiny facility (NDSF). In this study, various assumptions and parameters were discussed including the development strategies, technical evaluations, capabilities and current scenarios. The prime objective is to gain insight to the threat and unexpected issues regarding the race of nuclear technology in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and to safer the KSA region.
Nuclear Forensics, NDSF Facility, Establishment Procedures, Techniques, Security Threat
To cite this article
Salah Ud-Din Khan, Nuclear Forensics and Development of Non-Destructive Scrutiny Facility (NDSF) for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Nuclear Science. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2018, pp. 52-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ns.20180304.11
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
K. Mayer, M. Wallenius, K. Lützenkirchen, J. Galy, Z.Varga, N. Erdmann, R.Buda, J. V. Kratz , N. Trautmann , K. Fifield, Nuclear Forensics: A Methodology Applicable to Nuclear Security and to Non-Proliferation, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 312 (2011) 062003.
Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism 2015 Plenary Meeting: Joint Co-Chair Statement, June 17, 2015, Washington USA, http: //www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2015/06/243947.htm.
Klaus Mayer, Maria Wallenius, and Zsolt Varga, Nuclear Forensic Science: Correlating Measurable Material Parameters to the History of Nuclear Material, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 884−900.
Douglas C Duckworth, Atomic Spectroscopy, Forensic Science Applications, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
PM Boshielo, PR Mogafe, GM Nkosi, PP Magampa, JJ Hancke, Necsa’s need to establish a nuclear forensics specific NDA facility for onsite categorization of seized nuclear materials, Symposium on international safeguard: Linking Strategy, Implementation and People-IAEA CN-220, October 20-24, 2014, Vienna, Austria.
K. Mayer, M. Wallenius, T. Fanghanel, Nuclear forensic science—From cradle to maturity, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 444–445 (2007) 50–56.
Michael J. Kristo, Nuclear Forensics, Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384873-4.00021-9.
D. Roudila, C. Rigauxa, C. Riviera, J. C. Hubinoisb, L. Aufore, CETAMA contribution to safeguards and nuclear forensic analysis based on nuclear reference materials, Procedia Chemistry 7 (2012) 709 – 715.
S. Pomméa,n, S.M.Jerome, C.Venchiarutti, Uncertainty propagation in nuclear forensics, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 89 (2014) 58–64.
Richard van noorden, The medical testing crisis, Nature, Vol.504, Dec 2013.
Nuclear Forensics, Role, State-of-the-art, program needs, Joint working group of the American physical society and the Amercian association for the advancement of science, AAAS publications, http://www.aps.org/policy/reports/popa-reports/forensics.cfm.
Non Destructive and Destructive Analytical Techniques, PNNL-SA-77170.
Michael J. Kristo a, Scott J. Tumey, The state of nuclear forensics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294 (2013) 656–661.
Browse journals by subject